The researchers have paced different ways for solving thisproblem: 1- Some believe that suspicion is not forbidden instinctively, and express the famous prophetic tradition as their proof:

«ثَلاثٌ فِي الْمُؤْمِنِ لا يُسْتَحْسَنَّ وَ لَهُ مِنْهُنَّ مَخْرَجٌ، فَمَخْرَجُهُ مِنْ سُوءِ الظَّنِّ انْ لا يُحَقِّقَهُ» ..

There are three unfavorable things in the believer, and it ispossible for him to escape them, and it is possible to escape suspicion through not giving a follow- up to it.. [1]

2- Some others say avoiding suspicion refers to not giving afollow- up to it heartily and outwardly. In other words, he shall not establish" heart conclusion", which is freewill, in his heart, and not to feel a hate and disgust to the suspected person, and not to change his relations and behavior with him outwardly.

Thus, non- realization of suspicion refers to the same wide sense of word including mind and outward.

There is no doubt that these two are both against theappearance of the verse for avoiding susp icion and the traditionsmen tioned in this part, because they have forbidden suspicionitself, and there is not any hearty establishment aspect to beevitable.

But the issue of belief and hearty establishment is a freewillaffair( because belief and faith is something else thanknowledge, as it has been already proved ), but hate and disgustare not so.

3- The reality is that although suspicion is not voluntary atthe beginning, but its continuation is optional, because it usuallyori ginates from a series of unreal factors that cause such a

[1]Majlessi ,BeharolAnvar ,102 /57